Before you dive in: I recently launched Flight Lens—real-time flight intelligence for anyone who flies. A Pulse Index shows global aviation status, smart alerts track delays and price drops, and a live map lets you follow any aircraft. Use code LAUNCH for 50% off annual plan ($19.99 instead of $39.99).
In 2009 I wrote seven ways to say no, motivated by the observation that most people don’t practice the word. My framing was almost entirely technical: saying no is a skill, you just need to work out the right muscle for the right context, here are seven variations. I was right in that saying no is very important. I wasn’t quite spot on about the technique, I think now there’s a little more to it than just that.
What Technique Doesn’t Touch
The seven methods in the original post were about phrasing — ways to decline that are clear, honest, and calibrated to different social situations. That part is technically correct. What the post ignored at that time was the hidden layer, the “why”. The right approach was not about which type of negation to choose, but why it’s genuinely hard to say no in the first place.
It’s not that people don’t know the word. It’s that saying no activates something that feels a lot like danger. You risk disappointing someone. You risk being seen as difficult, unhelpful, selfish. For a lot of people — and I include myself here — that conditioning runs very deep. I reckon this must have been useful at some point. Being agreeable is a social survival strategy that works well in certain environments and certain phases of life.
The problem is that the survival strategy doesn’t automatically adjust – it still lingers long after it’s needed.
The technique advice is: say no clearly and without excessive explanation. The psychological reality is: you first have to convince yourself that you’re allowed to.
These are 2 different problems, and solving the first one doesn’t necessarily solve the second.
Where I’ve Gotten Better, Where I Haven’t
Seventeen years of practice means I can give an honest accounting.
I’ve gotten significantly better at saying no to new projects that arrive with energy and enthusiasm but no clear fit with what I’m actually trying to build. The older version of me would say yes and find out later that the enthusiasm was borrowed, or shallow. I’ve done that enough times to recognize the pattern early now.
I’ve gotten better at saying no to the version of myself that wants to explain, justify, and soften every refusal until the no becomes a maybe. A no that takes three paragraphs to deliver isn’t actually a no — it’s an invitation to negotiate. I can give very short “no”-s now.
Where I still struggle: I guess I’m still underselling myself sometimes, still don’t know how to say no to giving discounts (and that goes from financial discounts, up to attention discounts, so to speak).
On “Boundaries” and What the Word Gets Right and Wrong
The “boundaries” conversation that went mainstream in the 2020s is partly covering the same territory as my original post, and I have mixed feelings about it.
What it gets right: it moved the conversation from technique to permission. You’re not just learning how to decline — you’re recognizing that you have the right to. That’s the layer the 2009 post mostly skipped. The cultural normalization of saying “I’m not available for that” without elaborate justification is genuinely useful.
What gets lost: the word “boundaries” has been used so much that it’s started to mean almost anything — sometimes legitimate self-protection, sometimes just preferring not to be bothered. When everything is a boundary violation, the word stops doing work. And the framing can shift the focus from “what do I actually want?” to “what can I get away with refusing?” — which is a different and less interesting question.
The Most Important No
The most important no I’ve said recently wasn’t dramatic. It was turning down a business arrangement that had all the surface features of a good opportunity — credible people, reasonable terms, interesting problem space — but required me to be present and available in a way that would have consumed the time I currently use for building my own things.
The pull was strong because the opportunity was real. The no was uncomfortable because it wasn’t obviously the right call — it was a judgment call about what I’m building and what I’m protecting. Six months later, the time I protected has gone into ten apps and a steady writing practice and being more present with my family. The opportunity I declined has moved on without me and is fine.
That’s almost always how it goes. The thing you protect time for turns out to be the important one. The thing you said no to finds another way to exist without you.
This is something I try to keep in mind every time I find it difficult to say no.
📅 Then & Now — 30 Day Blog Challenge
View the challenge map →- Day 1: Answering My Own 33 Self-Interview Questions — 17 Years Later
- Day 2: What Tango Actually Taught Me About Relationships (A Decade Later)
- Day 3: Everything I Built That Fell Down (And What I Learned About Building Anyway)
- Day 4: 25 Things To Do In Your Life – Then And Now
- Day 5: The Action/Reaction Trap: Why I Had It Half Right in 2009
- Day 6: Boredom Is a Feature, Not a Bug — And We've Almost Deleted It
- Day 7: Raw Food in 2026: What I'd Tell My 2009 Self About Eating Better
- Day 8: 3 Lifestyle Design Blueprints I've Lived (Plus a 4th One That Works Best These Days)
- Day 9: 100 Ways to Live a Better Life — 17 Years After: What Actually Worked
- Day 10: 17 Years of Social Networks Later: What Actually Replaced What
- Day 11: Technology, Ideology, and What Actually Happened Since 2018
- Day 12: Steadily Fluid After 10 Years: How Does It Feel to Live With the Paradox?
- Day 13: The First 6 Months of Blogging After 17 Years of Blogging
- Day 14: 15 Years of Motivation: From Tiny, Genuine Sparks to Burning Out
- Day 15: The Right Tool for the Job in 2026: What AI Changes About the Wrench Problem
- Day 16: 7 Kung Fu Panda Lessons, 16 Years Later — What Po Actually Got Right
- Day 17: 77 Things I Still Want to Do, 13 Years Later — and What I've Crossed Off
- Day 18: How I Actually End My Day in 2026 - Compared with 2011
- Day 19: 7 Things To Do When the Shit Hits the Fan — 15 Years Later
- Day 20: Living as a Digital Nomad: Revisiting a 16-Year-Old Primer
- Day 21: 7 Reasons to Enjoy Life More — 16 Years Later
- Day 22: 77 Reasons to Love Your Life — Why I'd Write This Differently After 17 Years
- Day 23: The Diamond Cutter, 12 Years Later — Buddhism as a Daily Practice
- Day 24: Life Has No Meaning - In 2026 I Still Think This Is Good News
- Day 25: The Ancestor Syndrome - Revisiting Inherited Money Beliefs 10 Years After
- Day 26: Why I'm Still Learning to Say No (17 Years After Writing About It)
I've been location independent for 15 years
And I'm sharing my blueprint for free. The no-fluff, no butterflies location independence framework that actually works.
Plus: weekly insights on productivity, financial resilience, and meaningful relationships.
Free. As in free beer.